What is a disadvantage of direct attack strategies in firefighting?

Direct attack strategies in firefighting are characterized by the immediate engagement of the fire with resources at hand, often employing water or other fire suppression agents directly on the flames. While direct attack can be effective, a significant disadvantage is that it exposes firefighters directly to hazardous conditions, such as intense heat, smoke, and flames.

This exposure can be very risky, as firefighters are working close to the fire's edge, which increases their vulnerability to sudden changes in fire behavior or wind shifts. The environment can be unpredictable, and the intense conditions can lead to increased danger. Therefore, understanding the physical impacts of direct attack on firefighting crews is crucial in assessing the overall safety and effectiveness of firefighting strategies.

Direct attack strategies do facilitate easier mop-up due to the rapid suppression of the fire and can help utilize natural barriers, but these benefits must be weighed against the health and safety risks posed to firefighting personnel.